Dr. Nishiyama considered it impossible to perform a psychological examination of our father, and did not attempt to do it.
He also recognized the twilight state of our father but ignored it, by giving a reason that his observation was fragmentary. As an expert witness, he only needed to observe for a longer time.
Furthermore, he recognized attacks like seizures in our father but did not take it into consideration as his medical condition, although it was so serious that employees at the Detention House would worriedly go to talk to him.
Irregular speech and orientation (basic understanding of the situation including the current year, month, time, where he is, etc.) at the time when our father's condition was still moderate was concluded as fabrication.
Dr. Nishiyama agreed that communication was not successful, stating that there seemed to be no relationship between questions he asked and the noise sounding like nodding that our father was uttering at the time of visitation. Our father was far from being able to talk in front of Dr. Nishiyama as well.
Then, what did Dr. Nishiyama spend 168 days for? Did he only push the predetermined conclusion into the text titled as the expert opinion? Is it because it took so long to come up with the text to cover up failure of logic? We had no choice but to suspect it, as the expert opinion by Dr. Nishiyama was logically broken and did not make sense.
We would like to touch on the details of Dr. Nishiyama's "expert opinion" later.
No comments:
Post a Comment